State your answer and your reasoning of why any portion of the Constitution should or should not be changed.
Monday, August 22, 2011
1st Blog for Fall 2011 Term
State your answer and your reasoning of why any portion of the Constitution should or should not be changed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The constitution was written when our country was first founded. Back then, society was different. Our ammendments and the laws that society is to follow need some minor tweaking every so often. As a people, we become more and more socially integrated and rely a great deal on technology. Our society changes, and you cannot live based on the lifestyles of people one hundred years before you; hence, you cannot live with life revolving around laws that are based of said lifestyle. The foundation and core of our constitution should stay the same. Life is still life. But life now is more complicated, and minor changes should be made where needed to keep up to date with modern society.
ReplyDeleteNo, the constitution should not be changed. It has worked so far and will continue working just fine. Technology should not have any influence on our laws. Technology will come and go and will never be faithful; pen and paper will always be here.
ReplyDeleteYes, the constitution should be modified, but complete change is not necessary. I believe that as times change the constitution continues to set a wall for people's right, but in certain cases there are loop holes and way around the law. Both citizens and people in the government have ways of getting what they want, no matter if it is right or wrong. Taxes, unfair laws, unjustified convictions will continue to rape the citizens of the U.S if the constitution stays the same.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Heidi Nelson-Tudor. As times change the law should also have up-dates in order to truely protect our rights.
ReplyDeleteRecoginizing that people and times change there are some things that can be changed in the COnstitution that may help America as a whole. I assume that during the time the Constitutiion was formed age was a vital thing to think about when it came to muturity of a person holding office but what I do not understand is where they came up with the numbers of when you can hold an office. The constitution is good but there are some things that has changed in America. We must become clear once again on who we are, what standards we hold, and regain morals.We live in a place where we have destroyed our own selves by not being true to ourselves. Our constitution stood for strength, fairness, and equality but amazingly it has not worked as well as most people think. Change must come in order for us to grow as a people,and change will come.
ReplyDeleteHello Ericka while respecting your opion, I think technology will be around for a while and although it may not be of great value for our constitution it is important and hold some value.
ReplyDeleteI truly wish I could say that our constitution has been the very best thing for us but as our country has change some people has feared change and change can be good and America has fought each other long enough through pen and paper. We must reconstruct some things in our constitution that we as a people will be unified.
Jason H 67
ReplyDeleteThe portion of the Constitution that is outdated to me is Amendment 6 – Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnessed. I say this because too many times we have witnessed people get away with crimes that we as society know for a fact they are guilty of having committed. Jurors, more often times than not are partial to many defendants for various reasons such as gender, race and status rank. More often times than not, when a defendant is a celebrity, it is almost impossible to have an impartial judgment.
Jason H 67 in response to Olivia Johnson-Bey
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Olivia that the constitution should be modified but not changed completely. There are many loop holes that people in politics use to their advantage to hurt the everyday common people. The right people in the right places can make anything work to benefit themselves.
My answer to this is NO. This is the foundation for this country. If you start chipping it away, it will collapase. Then where would this country be now if it did not exist? It was designed to help the people in America. It has over 200 years in our history. The moral values of people, in my eyes, have gone down hill. Everybody wants what they want right now and how they want it. I do understand that times have changed so much but, what if that technology just disappeared? Where would the people be without our original constitution? Our forefathers lost their very lives to create and protect the freedoms she provides.
ReplyDeleteCharles S.
ReplyDeleteThe original founding fathers put in to place, the ten amendments known as the bill of rights to provide a stepping stones on the way to an ever-changing governmental body. Going back and altering these original ten amendments would be nothing short of blasphemy, and would seem extremely uncalled for. To change the roots of what our country was originally founded on would most likely cause a major uproar among the people as well as the government officials that do not agree. In a sense It is like if we were to change the ten commandments, religions would go haywire. If this happens, this could be the end of our government as we know it.
Lafarah P
ReplyDeletei believe that the constitution is perfectly fine the way it is and should not be changed, to change the constitution would be asking for trouble and be giving people a reason to act even crazier in my eyes. if its worked this long then why change it ?
LatanyaK-95
ReplyDeleteYes, the laws in the Bill of Rights are outdated. The Bill of Rights became apart of our Constitution over two hundred plus years ago to protect and perserve the way of life for many individuals. Those laws were written based on how the world was viewed then. There were many things that didn't quite transition when those laws went into effect, like the issues with slavery, womens rights, and others being denied the right to vote. Simply people were not being treated equally. I personally think that these changes if any laws are to be changed need to happen in order for us as a nation to grow not to just move on but to accomodate the people and changes of our era. Yes, the United States can benefit from this change. Change is inevatable, exceptance is not. However like the sun that sets every day our lives will go on whether we except it or not.
LatanyaK-95. In response to Charles S.
ReplyDeleteI respect your opinion, but I believe that sometimes the root is where the problem exists. Exp. Like our hair follicle. Sometimes our roots can be really stubborn and all the chemicals we put into our hair can stunt our hair growth. Then we realize, maybe it's all that stuff i've put into my hair thats created the problem. Sometimes we have to be proactive and give it a little stimulation to help it along, not too much but just enough. Guess what happens? We've now corrected some of the wrong things we did and now our hair is growing as a result. So what i'm trying to say is if there's an issue sometimes we need to go to the root and correct it while we have the oppertunity.
RebeccaG-69
ReplyDeleteYes, the Constitution is outdated somewhat. But, I think it should not be changed. It was written for a reason and it should not be changed. To me, we should focus more on the economy,finding more usable resources, and building our country to be better. The constitution is not our problem, our economy and our government needs a lot of improvement seeing that now it's falling apart.
RebeccaG-69 In Response To Erica Duncan
ReplyDeleteI agree that technology is a come and go, but it should have some laws on it. Because then people can create whatever they want and one does not know if it could be a bad thing or a good thing to put out into the world. Laws will always have something to do with almost everything created in technology.
Sparkle R. - Yes I most definitely think the Bill of Rights is outdated. People, the world, and society has changed and is very different from when the Bill of Rights were written. It doesn't have the same value and meaning as it did back in the day.
ReplyDeleteCristen Lahaie
ReplyDeleteI believe a little bit of everything needs to be changed. There are some laws and ways of life that have changed from present day to back when the constitution. So yes the constitution needs to be updated. Also I believe that we as a unified people need to impose a better check and balance system on our government and the leaders we elect. We need true statesman who care about our well being and our states well being above their own personal gain. Our infastructure is falling apart and the economy is in shambles. Instead of sending billions of our tax dollars over seas in foreign aid , we need to bring our own money back home and use it to help w/t the infastructure and to help put people back to work like roosevelt did back during the early 20th century. Overall, we need change as a whole and if starting w/t the constitution begins it then so be it!
Lelia C.
ReplyDeleteThe Constitution is not the problem, its the people who are running this country. You start taking certain things from it, then everbody will want to take something they don't agree with from it and then before you know it, there will be nothing left of it and it will be meaningless. Those are the roots in which this country was founded...take it away and watch it fall.
AshleyF 67
ReplyDeleteI firmly believe that the constitution does not need to be changed. Although it was written in a time where technology essentially did not exist it was written well and the foundation of what was written still holds true today. Technology is changing ever so fast and if we changed the constitution now who's to say it wouldn't be changed every 50 years or less with the increase in technology? To me that does not seem fair and it certainly isn't good for our society to have things changed just because our technology is more advanced than they used to be.
AshleyF 67 in response to Lelia C.:
ReplyDeleteI completely agree! People are selfish and greedy and if things were to change everyone would want it their way. The constitution is not based on the needs of certain individuals but as an entire society and what is best for them as a whole- not individuals.
Lelia C. in response to AshleyF 67:
ReplyDeleteWONDERFUL STATEMENT!! If we all had it our way, we would be Burger King, not the United States of America. I don't know why people think it's okay to change things they have no right to change. WE are the people, we should decide our fate not have our fate decided for us by flaky individuals. Yes, our technology is more advanced now but the PRINCIPLES and MORALS behind our Constitution should remain the same.
The Constitution and the Amendments were written with purpose. They were both written, especially the Constitution is state America's separation from Great Britain. Today it is as if they both are just a part of America's history. The men that were involved with creating these documents, they did not all agree on a personal level, but came to agreement and compromise for the sake of their country. America stood for freedom. Today most of the "right" if you will, are taken to the extreme. We are not all going to agree, but we to understand and think about what is truly best for this country. If we are constantly fighting and bickering with one another, then what is freedom? You can't say its freedom of speech, although some would argue with you. Sometimes it is just best to keep our opinions to ourselves.
ReplyDeleteIn response to Rebecca G 69: I agree. Those documents are over 200 years old, but they do not need to be changed. I believe that if America would have stood up for what they believed and what they wrote, we may not be in this situation. Our leaders though do need to focus on the economy.
ReplyDeletePatti S70
ReplyDeleteI believe the Constitution and the Bill of Rights should not be changed. These are the foundations of our great nation. The Founding Fathers who created these documents created them with everyone in mind and not just a single person. To some, they may seem outdated, however; they apply to us today as they applied to our ancestors. There are laws that need to be changed to protect the very freedoms we are granted in The Bill Of Rights.
Patti S70 in response to Jason H67
ReplyDeleteI completely respect your opinion on Amendment 6, but I do not agree that it is outdated. I believe that we should implement laws to protect it. When trials take a long period of time to come through the court and the media gets active in that case, people tend to convict the accused before the trial even begins. This is where technology becomes a problem. This does not mean that the Amendment is outdated. There should be laws to protect it.
Bernard O. 70
ReplyDeleteI don't believe the United States constitution should be changed. Our founding fathers were wise men who took the time to organize a constitution that will last. Although its been over 200 years since the U.S. constitution was written, it still works.Changing the constitution may give people an excuse to commit crime if it is not well put together.I think the best to do is to add to the constitution instead of changing it.
Bernard O. 70. In response to Sparkle R.
ReplyDeleteYou might think the constitution is outdated but if you remember The Bill of Rights was added to protect the right of the people and states. Lets go back to history class a little. If you remember, the states and people were afraid of having a strong central government because they didn't want a government based on dictatorship or monarchy. So to protect them, the Bill of Rights was introduced.Your right about the world and people changing but to me the United States constitution still have the value as it did 200 years ago.Things might have changed but the constitution still protect our individual and natural rights.
John B.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what Leila C. said for the most part. The problem lies in the hands of our elected officials. I believe these rights were thoroughly thought over and still remain completely relevant to todays society. These rights were what are country was founded on. They have worked for hundreds of years but are slowly being chipped away by the left and in some instances the right. Every member of the legislative branch has a personal agenda they are pushing, and they, along with the judicial branch (9th circuit court of appeals) are challenging and trying there best to "adjust" the bill of rights to there liking. Leave the founding laws alone. I don't want to live in a Marxist country. No government will ever tip the scales so that everyone has what they need equally!
The Bill of Rights is a well written document that is sufficient. The question candidates should really be asking themselves is! What can we do to make sure the laws and rights that are already in place are being followed? Stand firm on these bills before trying to change or implement new bills.
ReplyDeleteI strongly believe that when the Bill of Rights were written in September of 1787, and accepted in June of 1788, there were arguments that was ingnored. The Bill of Rights has been ammended twenty-seven times, and " We the People", are still not happy and want change. I agree that society is way much different than before, but a smart man came forward and wanted to address a purpose. This purpose was to set limits on what the goverment can and cannot do to protect us as citizens. Why have these rights in place if only a select few can change these laws. An example of one change that comes to mind is; the protection of white men. The original Bill of Rights included this legal protection for white men only. This excluded African Americans and women. Now remind you I am a woman. But, I think that ONE person, believing to be a woman or African American, came forward and wanted to change a law to suit their needs. Then with lots of petitions and soliticiting, guess what, they got their way. Same with this new thing going on. It states that we the people have the freedom to bear arms for our defence. Well, now ONE person thinks this has causeed all the violence in the world and they start advertising and petitioning, then guess what, leads to change again. Where is the rock we need for stability. Why can't we have a powerful man to say this is how it is, and is going to be. I know there is corruption is this world today, but we as the people made it this way. I vote "NO CHANGE ." Follow the BIBLE, it don't pick and choose, or change to accommadate ONE person. The Lord is the answer.
ReplyDeleteSarah H. said...
ReplyDeleteIn response to Rebecca G 69: I agree. Those documents are over 200 years old, but they do not need to be changed. I believe that if America would have stood up for what they believed and what they wrote, we may not be in this situation. Our leaders though do need to focus on the economy.
Sara, I totally agree with your post. We stand up for our family and friends, why not the American Constitution. The leaders focus on their needs only. Accommadation only applies to ones who can make change.
Micah S 67
ReplyDeleteI think that changing the constitution would benefit this country greatly. Our constitution was written in the context that they lived in then and that was totally different than it is today. While the courts do interpret these laws, the change would make it easier for U.S. citizens to understand. After all, there have been quite a few amendments made to the constitution so why not perfect it and make it relevant to today's world!
Micah S 67 in response to Christina B 67
ReplyDeleteI love your reference to the consitution "We the people." That was well said. I totalla agree with the change. The constitution is very outdated and needs to be written in today's context.
Society is constantly changing, moral views, and aspects towards what the nation needs/doesn't need. Nobody will agree with every article or amendment stated in the constitution because we are constantly changing. You must also remember, 200 years ago women/African Americans did not share the same rights as other Americans. It took time and progress for peoples aspects to change and realize what is right and wrong. Over time, new amendments were being added to the Constitution to better our society, so why not change certain amendments to do the same? If you concentrate too much on the past, you will be left behind. Although I don't believe any major changes are necessary, if a few adjustments to the constitution must happen to better the U.S, then so be it.
ReplyDeleteIn response to Heidi Nelson-Tudo: I agree with you fully. You cannot live based on the lifestyles of people one hundred years or more before you. Life goes on and changes must be made to accommodate.
The Constitution of the United States are rules that created the law of the land. Having strict contructionism means you believe that the constitution means exactly what it says & if you are an originalist you believe the constitution says exactly what the founders meant it to say. Yes, these are close but not the same. I do feel that our society does changes, more these days than ever, however the Constitution of the United States is our foundation & the stepping stones that set that into place should remain the same. I have to admit I have been torn over this debate. Times change & people change & obviously our ways of thinking are going to be influenced. No matter what one truly feels you must always stay true to GOD because he is the same GOD for us all.
ReplyDeleteTracey D - 67
ReplyDeleteI do not feel that the United States would benefit from a legal overhaul of the Constitution and or the Bill of Rights. These documents should remain in the same formats which they were designed as they are the foundation to our country. There is already a way to make changes by way of amendments, so why do we need an "overhaul"? In order to take on such a task as a legal overhaul, it would take a great deal of time and money, which could be spent on turning our economy in the right direction. The Bill of Rights are here to provide us with basic rights, which I am very thankful to have and would never want that to be changed.
TraceyD 67 in response to AshleyF 67....
ReplyDeleteWell written and I totally agree with you on the idea that technology will continue to change and why should we continue to make changes to the basic rights of the people because of new advances in our technology.
TraceyD 67 in responce to SparkleR 67 -
ReplyDeleteI do not agree with your point of view that the value and the meaning have changed just because our times have changed. These are rights of the people and they do have value and they do have meaning. I value the people who provided us with the rights we have today and it means a great to me to be able to have freedom and protection.
Angell A.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Eureka B., the candidates should be making sure the laws that are already in place are being followed, not changing them to suit their own needs at that time. Leave the Constitution alone.
LeeAnn Vastey
ReplyDeleteShould we change parts of the constitution? No, because as much as we have advanced socially and technologically, we have also become more corrupt. This land was land was founded to escape oppression and we have now become the oppressors ... Using loop holes in every system or law put in place since the time of the constitution to make it ok to do as we please no matter what the cost. Our personal agendas or "opportunities" come before anything and if any person, group, or nation stands in the way no matter how unjust or contradictory to our ancestors hope for this country they will be eliminated. So if we were to make adjustments every time someone says times have changed we would have no ground to stand on... We have become too estranged to the idea of priorities. To be fair will say that not everyone is corrupt and that there are people capable of adjusting the constitution without the desire to create bigger loop holes for themselves and stopping what benefits only them but there is always bias and everyone will never agree... Even clarification of what the constitution says is dangerous because there is bias in interpretation of another's words .
We live in a great country where we can be free to live our lives as we desire. We all have to follow the laws of the land and sometimes these laws are unfair, but mostly effective. Our ancestries came to here to get away from tyrants that made the laws as they went. The poor went hungry and were put in jail (if they were caught) for stealing a piece of old bread. Then when the Father died, the children were liable for the Father's debts and put in a debtors jail. In some countries they took all the firearms away and then there were only the criminals who had the guns. Here in American we still have the right to bear arms (2nd amendment), we still have the right to free speech, to live where we please, and many more rights that mean a lot to all of us if we will just stop and think about it. I am very proud to be a part of this country even though there might be some changes needed to some things, but not to our constitution, and not to what our founding fathers fought and died for. I thank God every day for living in a country where I can be free. No, we do not need to change the constitution or amendments.
ReplyDeleteResponse to Charles S....I completely agree with you. To change the constitution would be blasphemy to our Forefathers. No one should change what has been given to us freely and unconditionally.
ReplyDeleteMSherer 69
ReplyDeleteNo, I do not believe that the Constitution should be altered in any way. Our Founding Father's designed and implemented these rights to set the foundation for our country. These have been essential in the success of America for over 200 years, and are, in my opinion, a reason that America has been the leading country in the world. Perhaps it's coincidental, but I think not, that those who are speaking of changing the Constitution are the same who are leading during the worst econimical times that America has seen in many years.
MichaelS 69
ReplyDeleteI agree with John H.
"The problem lies in the hands of our elected officials."
Everyone needs to get out and vote. This is exactly the reason why. We don't need to change the Constitution, but rather, who is running our country.
Melanie P.-70
ReplyDeleteI am not opposed to changing the Constitution at all. There have been many important changes to the constitution throughout history, for example giving African Americans and women the right to vote. I'm sure that, at the time, the idea of a women voting was absolutely absurd! I wish we could all appreciate the constitution for what it is, but be open minded when there comes a time for change. Nothing stays the same for ever.
Frank J 67
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely not!! Even though our current and past Presidents have already made changes to these documents indirectly and illegally ie, the Patriot Act, which states that whenever the President deems necessary or in "a state of emergency". The Patriot Act wipes out these amendments:First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth. Our freedom to assemble, he will be able to outlaw protests, our freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures ie, these pat downs that people are getting in the airports, they are treating us like terrorists first then cleared to go through. The fourteenth amendment one is scary, right of due process, if the president deems necessary he will be able to lock people up without trial for something as harmless as protesting. A lot of people believe that altering these documents will make us "more free". The Bill of Rights completely addresses our basic and fundamental rights. Altering it makes the foundation this nation was built on weaker and weaker.
The constitution was established when our Fore Fathers were living under tyranny. They were living under oppression. So for people to say that it was written for that time period shows that they don't know the circumstances under which it was written. The Bible was written MANY years ago yet billions of people hold on to its principles because they pertain to modern day applications....same with our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Tyranny is tyranny whether they lived in mud thatched houses or high rise condos. Swords instead of drone aircraft. When you start to alter these documents, you open up the door for corrupt, power hungry politicians who serve their special interest groups more than the American people. The constitution and Bill of Rights were written for us, the American citizens, to protect us from over bearing government. It gives us the right and ability to remove our ELECTED officials from office, we have the right to do that. Our Fore Fathers were very inspired men. They had this nation's best interest at heart. Read the Declaration of Independence. It has an uncanny and creepy resemblance to what the current and past few presidents have put this nation through.
Frank J 67
ReplyDeleteOlivia Johnson-Bey i disagree. We will continue to have taxes, unfair laws, and unjustified convictions until we have elected officials who do what they take an oath to do....to UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. We shouldn't change the constitution to fit around the tyranny we are put through, we need to elect people who will do what they say they are going to do. If they don't, we have the right and power to have them impeached by Congress....that's if they aren't corrupt either.
Melanie P.-70 in response to what Daquan Francis said...
ReplyDeleteVery well put! I think your openness to change is something a lot of people lack. I think everything changes in time and even if there isn't *currently* a change you see necessary, there definitely could be one in the future.
MauriceR
ReplyDeleteChange does not mean, "We throw out the baby with the bath water." It means with re-evaluate, assess, and build on a solid foundation--our strengths.
Bill No. 2: “Right to keep and bear arms” needs to be updated to reflect current attitudes towards gun control and ownership. Today, Americans have a world class military: Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine, and Reservists—a plethora of soldiers. Also, in case of domestic strife we have the National Guard. When was the last time we needed a militia? I said militia, not an angry mob, vigilantes or a few concerned citizen waving guns.
When this law was in introduced, we were a young democracy. The need to form a militia for defense and protection made more sense when the French, Spanish, English, Native Americans, African slaves, Northerner, Southerner, trespassing neighbor, and whomever else fought that generation for sovereignty. Not to mention, as pioneers venturing out into unspoiled territories, the new Americans had to tangle with those angry bears, wolves, coyotes, rabid raccoons, mountain lions, and/or crazy foxes in a settler’s hen house.
I understand some positions and practices of a gun collector/historian, law enforcement official, law-abiding citizen, and/or avid hunter. However, the use of this law to condone gun ownership is a big stretch in today’s America. The authors of the “Bill of Rights” did not know or envision we would develop such powerful and deadly bullets and guns when they created this law. As well as, guns would be so readily available legally and illegally. We are no longer “free States” but one United States.
Maria S.
ReplyDeleteI do not believe that just because the constitution was written in the 1700's that it has become not functional. Throughout our history the people of this nation have been able to make changes to the constitution by adding amendments to it. When slavery was abolished, the 13th amendment was written; when all people born in this country were giving their right to become citizens,the 14th amendment was written; when women adquired their right to participate in electing the people who would represent them,the 19th amendment was written and so on. I feel that the constitution was put in place to set up the goverment and to make sure that there is a separation of power, both of which protect us from any one person or group of people to have too much power... that would be a threat to our own rights. who is to decide what to change or how much to change? The Bill of Rights exist to protect us from a TOO powerful government. If the government becomes too powerful then... who will protect us, the people.
The Constitution was created to secure the BASIC rights of all Americans; it was geared to protect and govern the fundamental principles that regulate our individual existence and co-existence. Technology has changed our lifestyle, but cannot change our fundamental needs (we still need food, clothes and shelter; we still need to be treated with equality; we still need to follow the law). Technology will continue to improve and enhance our lives each day, IT WILL CHANGE. There needs to be a benchmark by which we function (The Constitution); and it cannot be as whimsical as technology, trends, lifestyle choices, etc. It must be rooted on the basic needs of all people - equal rights, as each person attain their dream of “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” That is what the Constitution and especially the Bill of Rights provides, and why it should not be changed.
ReplyDeleteKayla W.-69
ReplyDeleteAlthough times have changed and they will continue to change, the constitution should remain the same. The laws in the constitution are basic laws to build on and they are still relivent today and will continue to be relivent. The constitution was written so that the government does not have all the power, change it and the Government will gain more power. They gain power, we, as Americans, lose our rights.
Kayla W.-69 in response to Maria S.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you. I believe that the ammendments that were made were necessary to be made while the times were changing, but times, even though they are changing, are not differing from the foundamental blocks that were built when the Constitution was written. Even if they do change who is going to be the person that says things need to change? Expesually since Americans have so many differing opinions on every issue.
(Sarah Blackwell 16)
ReplyDeleteThe Bill of Rights were written to prevent the wrongings that our founders had experienced. They had escaped the control of a king, and they wanted to make sure the citizens of the United States did not have to experience that either. These rights have generally done their job. I'm not saying the US goverment is perfect. Change is needed greatly. However, I do not believe it is with the Bill of Rights. Something needs to happen. However, congress and Senate has proven twice this year they are incapable of reaching decisions best for this country and in result citizens such as our military personell have been threatened to have their pay held. The back wards part of this all is that those not doing their job or meeting deadlines is the US government and their paychecks were never risked to be withheld. I believe change and reform is needed but we need to look else where.
Sarah b 16 in response to Maria S..
ReplyDeleteVery good perspective you have given. There is need for minor adjustments as time goes on, but admendments allow for that. If only we could elect some representatives who were able to reach decisions with out going past their deadlines. However, I blame the voters and non voters who helped elect these canidates to sit in office and continue to collect their pay check, and take their weeks of vacation even when the country is in need of a decision to be reached.
Andrea B. – In response to Lelia C. and Ashley 67
ReplyDeleteI TOTALLY agree with you guys. And Lelia your “Burger King” statement was so funny. It would be to our detriment to have our Constitution changed by something as dynamic as technology, and once we start changing the building blocks of what makes the United States of America what it is, we would not be able to recognize what’s left in a few years. Our forefathers were intuitive in their creation of the Constitution (they focused on the principal needs), we cannot say it is outdated when we as a people have not even lived by all that it dictates. We are still struggling to enforce all aspects of the Bill of Right (and that’s only 10 amendments).
The constitution was put in place to create and maintain a fair and balanced society. I do not believe the question of whether or not the Bill of Rights should be changed should be answered with a "yes" or a "no". It is very obvious that the world we live in today is nothing like it was in the late 1700's. In certain situations it may be necessary to alter the original content BUT still PRESERVE THE ORIGINAL IDEA. Again, this would depend on the situation. For 200+ the constitution has led America to be a thriving nation, and careful thought must go into even the slightest of altering if ever found "necessary".
ReplyDeleteI believe the constitution needs to be change because evidently, what the government of the United states is doing right now according to their Bill of Rights, is actually hurting people in many ways. Although America is the most convenient country to be for as freedom it's still not the best when it comes to the economy of the U.S.
ReplyDeleteEven though times have changed and we now live in a more technological society, no part of the constitution should be changed. We have lived by these laws forever and i think if they go off and change it it's going to lead to more trouble. Plus everything that was written in it still works, so why change something that doesn't need to be fixed. Instead of candidates focusing on changing laws why can't they focus more on how they will get this economy back up and running.
ReplyDeleteElizabeth V. I believe there should be NO change to the Bill of Rights. These Amendments were carefully written to protect US from the government. The right to bear arms was put in there not so we can protect our familys' from intruders or strictly to have malitia but to give the commonwelth the ability to prevent tyranny. "A disarmed society is an obidient society." Regardless of technology ANY change to the constitution is a path down a slippery slope of goverment interferance. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
ReplyDeleteBJ C. I believe that the Constitution is not a stagnant unchangeable document. The Constitutions of many countries have experienced numerous amendments since their beginning. There is no need to believe that the constitution is so picture-perfect and flawless that there should not at some time be a need for its amendment. The behavior and actions of societies change over time, and through these changes suitable methods of managing these different cultures also need to change. Sometimes this necessitates alterations to the Constitution. All great governing bodies recognize this need.
ReplyDeleteBJ C in response to Chris A.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. This is not about changing the basic principles of the constitution, this is about the small changes that have to be made as society changes in our country. Any changes that are made need to be looked at as life altering decisions because that is exaclty what they are. When our Constitution changes so does the way people live their lives in our country.
OCTAVIUS K.
ReplyDeleteOn my view,I don think the constitution over-haul is necessary to make it align with technological changes. My thinking is, unless there are some rights getting violated due to the changing world,may be amendments might be necessary.Otherwise, the way they were written was meant to serve for the longest time and that is why they have stood for that long. May be time will tell as the technology is becoming the way of life everyday.
Gavin N.
ReplyDeleteI for one believe that the bill of rights is outdated, for the sole fact that it was created in a time when people had some sense of right and wrong. Too many times these days do people use lawyers to twist and turn the amendments to get them off the hook for something they did. If anything, i honestly believe that they need to be a little stricter, like the saying goes, the more freedom there is, the more chaos that comes with it.
Kudirat A
ReplyDeleteNo I do not believe that the Constitution of this great Country should be changed because I believe that it helps govern the country and gives a foundation for the country on how law should be made. No the forefathers of this country did not foresee advanced technological changes to the society or even diversity to this degree in the foundation they left in the Constitution. However, the Constitution allows us today to make new laws to accommodate changes in our society.
Tonia D 15
ReplyDeleteThe U.S. Constitution is the foundation for our government and it keeps the government within its proper bounds. I do not believe that there is a need for any changes to the Constitution. The same issues that the Constitution addresses from when it was first established are basically the same issues that are relevant today.
Tonia D 15 in responce to Andrea B:
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you. As I stated in my post, the U.S. Constitution is our foundation to our government. It was made to secure our fundemantal/basic rights and it recognizes and protects those rights. If there was a definite need for an ammendment to any part of the Constitution the BASIC idea should be kept intact.
Porsha P44
ReplyDeleteThe constitution has caused many anjust acts. The constituiton needs to be changed. We have more knowlede than we did a decade ago due to technology. This country has been thru a vast amount of social and cultural change. People back I disagree with the amendment to bear arms because of the high crime rate. I aslo feel people are not getting equal right to a fair trial. There are still people who are getting railroaded for small crimes. Some people dont receive fair councel in trials. The bill of rights need changes.
Porsha P44 in response to Olivia Johnson-Bey
ReplyDeleteI agree with the constituion being modified. Somethings should stay in place. There are to many loop holes in the constitution. The amount of unjustified convictions are ridiculous.
David G.
ReplyDeleteLaws, in general, need to be 'universal' in their scope. They should not be written to fit any current peoples or institutions changing moods. Was the Bill of Rights written too loosely or thoughtlessly? I think not; but if so, then it should be re-written to accomodate broader, more timeless usage.
Meghan Williams:
ReplyDeleteAs many people have said before I don't think it should be completely changed, but few modifications here and there could be beneficial, considering how advanced our nation has become and some things in the Constitution have become slightly outdated. Thats what the amendments are for, when slavery was abolished we added the 13 amendment.
Denell B.70
ReplyDeleteA very interesting topic...I do not believe that the U.S. Constitution needs an "over-haul" but as many have stated, it could use some tweaking. It could use some "up-dating" concerning todays society. The first section that came to mind was Section 8: To borrow Money on the credit of the United States. Just look at the credit of the United Stated today!Limits should be set.
Denell B. 70 In response to David G.
ReplyDeleteI agree that "Laws, in general, need to be 'universal' in their scope". But as society changes so should the degree of law. As stated before, what about the 13 amendment? I do believe that it should be written to accomodate a broader, more timeless usage of todays
society.:)
I totally agree. The Constitution is the foundation for our government. It addresses the basics of government. Our founding fathers knew what needed to be in place for our government to function. More focus should be on why we are in such a disarray with the economy instead of the Constitution.
ReplyDeleteThe Constitution should not be changed. The Constitution represents the freedoms that we enjoy today. It is everything that the people stand for. We are able to enjoy the comforts of home with computers and newest phones with the laws already in place. Technology changes everyday. Does that mean that the laws must change everyday because of the technology?
ReplyDeleteRyan H, 69
ReplyDeleteI do think that there could always be improvements to legal documents in order to keep up with all the changes that occur in society. The Constitution is actually pretty vague in many respects and therefore has been able to adapt with the times so it may not be necessary at this present time to alter it, but I do think we should not limit ourselves by saying we should never change it. Technology has created a new territory of invasive behaviors, and there may need to be some amendment that pertains to this in the near future.
MaryO-70
ReplyDeleteThere is a process to make ammendments to the constitution today. It requires 2/3 of both houses of congress and 3/4 of the states to approve the ammendments. There is somewhat of a safe gaurd having this process, rather than allowing just a few individuals to have power and authority over changes in the constitution. However, I would not support radical changes in the ammendment. We were a country founded on Christian beliefs and principles and I would not want to see that part of our constitution changed.
MaryO-70
ReplyDeleteI agree with Kudriat A, the constitution has served this country well for hundreds of years. There are provisions given to add laws or ammend laws but to accomodate for a cultural changes. But not to revamp the whole constitution.
Christina B-69
ReplyDeleteTrue enough the consitution was written along time ago, but thats not a vaild reason why we should change it. Our society have been living by this constituion since it was written, we as people enjoy the freedom that is given to us, therefore making changes to the constituion is the same as making changes to our freedom. If certain Amendments were changed for instance Amendment II which is a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.There will be more choas than the law will be able to handle so why put many people at risk of harm, and possible start another war when our socitey is already living comfortably.
Christina B-69
ReplyDeleteI agree with Kayla and with Tawana, our government dosent need to have all the power thats why the Constitution stands for our freedom and to have some power over ourselves. We as people deserve every right that has been given to us. Technology has a big impact on our society and will continue to change which is fine, but with or without Technology our Society has been living in comfort based on our Constitution. Therefore its not nessesary to change the way our society is living.
Tameca L 85
ReplyDeleteOur Constitution was written hundreds of years ago. It was written as the bases of our laws. to protect everyone's rights and freedom. And no i do not think it should be changed. i feel that if everyone would abide by the laws instead of trying to find a way around them, our county would be a better place. and even though society has changed, it does not mean our laws change.
Tameca L85
ReplyDeleteI agree with Tawana S69. the Constitution should not be changed. again technology will always change, society will always change, but the bases of our laws should not change. and people should stop trying to find away around those laws.
Renee A 67
ReplyDeleteI do not feel the Constitution should be changed. Yes our Founding Fathers wrote this hundreds (wow) of years ago, but I don't think their wish was for it to be changed because our society has changed. Sure there could be some revised items but lets not wake them from their graves by changing, adding, revising, amending etc.
Leave this wonderful piece of history alone.
George M. 67
ReplyDeleteI feel like the Bill of Rights is outdated and does not necessarily represent the conditions of these times. 300 years ago bearing arms and quartering soliders were important efforts as the U.S. was going through a revolutionary period. At this time there are more issues we face in our day to day lives then worrying about if the British are coming. The Constituition should be amended to reflect that. Laws should be malleable to reflect and protect the needs of the people.
HERB-67
ReplyDeleteThe planet gets smaller and smaller each day due to the advances made in communications in the last 100+ years. Couldn't it JUST be possible that it's time to drop all borders, abandon all egos and finally become a united, human race? Then we could exchange ideas and work towards building a better tomorrow, instead of chasing our tails in an environment where worthless pieces of paper define the value of a person. Yes, I believe changes are due... but WHAT changes... and HOW, when everybody is still preoccupied with petty, global gainsaying?
HERB-67
ReplyDeleteI'll side with Heidi... It's only logical to update the system, when the society it was created to protect continues to change on a daily basis. Perhaps if we could just reel some things in and restore a sense of community, there would be far less alienated citizens who feel like they are nothing more than wage slaves identified within the system by 10-digit tax ID codes.
Samisha S-67
ReplyDeleteI do not think that the Constitution should be changed. Yes, it was wrote hundreds of years ago, but sometime change isn't better. However, I think with so much time has passed, that it may be okay to add things to it. The first 10 amendments are very important. I believe if we change them, we will be giving more people freedom to break rules. I think we should keep the old ones and add new ones if needed.
Samisha S67
ReplyDeleteresponding to Christina B-69
I totally agree with you. I feel that if some things needed to be added or revised, then that's okay. However, I do not think it should be changed. Yes, society has changed, but that is not all good. People do not share the same morals from people in the past.
Latreecia M. 69 I believe the Constitution should be changed to accommodate changes in todays' time. A lot has changed since the writing of the Constitution and I think it needs to be evaluated thus far for changes. I believe the right to bear arms and the article concerning quartering soldiers should be changed/taken out. Thats just outdated to say the least. I believe the right to bear arms should be revoked simply because of the outrageous crimes that go on today and the indecent use of firearm based on disagreements, religious prosecution, etc. The article concerning quartering soldiers is completely outdated and not necessary to even mention in my opinion. Perhaps a more important and relevant article should take its place. I do not believe that the entire Constitution needs to be revised but there are certainly sections that desperately need revising.
ReplyDeleteLatreecia M. 69 in response to George M. 67, I totally agree with you. I dont think the entire Constitution needs to be changed but I do think that there are a few things that could stand to be revised or completely swapped out period. The needs of the US has changed with the events that now affect us as a country. The Constitution should be changed to reflect the needs that we face today.
ReplyDeleteLa Tonya C. 67
ReplyDeleteYes, I think that our country could benefit from some modifications to our United States Constitution. To dismiss technologies advancement and the dramatic role it continuously plays in reformatting how we govern ourselves today, would be reckless. Communication is fundamental, as we live in a society were technology is ever increasing. Our technological advancement moves at such a rapid pace that we’re are in a constant cycle of rewriting, modifying and updating the way technology communicates to reprogram outdated processes , unrelated information and inoperable equipment that no longer meet the needs, demands or requirements to effectively and proficiently run a network of systems. If our technology is this smart, then shouldn’t the ones (he/ she) who creates, rewrites and reprograms the original network/ society put in place to enhance everyone’s way of life be credited with the wisdom to change what needs to be changed, leave what needs to be left and the understanding to know the difference.
La Tonya C 67 in response to Heidi Nelson-Tudor
ReplyDeleteHeidi, I agree with your statement. In a society, where we recognize a reasonable amount of change/ modification is warranted in almost every facet throughout life; it’s amazing to observe one of the worlds most advanced civilizations fueled by its thirst for knowledge and the demand for cutting-edge technological advancement in hospitals, school systems, cars, media devices and homes, but seem to repeatedly miss the mark on the human/ social advancement. I understand & respect what the founders of this country did when putting together the United States Constitution; however, those men didn’t put this country together on their own. It took the ingenuity, diversity and the courage of many to stand behind and alongside those individuals, who saw that through their own advancements and achievements there needed to be a modification in the practices used at “that time” to govern their current way of life.
Domenic R. 70
ReplyDeleteBeing that the Bill of Rights limits the power of the U.S. Federal Government, it should not be amended any further. The Bill of Rights contains a basic of laws that we take for granted every day, such as the freedom of: religion, speech, free press, free assembly, free association, the right to bear arms, etc. Take away any of these freedom's and we're back to a time that men were literally fighting to get away from. The part of the Bill of Rights that is outdated is the "Old English" language in which it is written.
Brisa L. 70
ReplyDeleteI believe that the constitution is not outdated because it was based on solid principals. America being such as diverse, and technologically culture it is even more important that we stress these principals. For these reasons many people come for all over the world to experience freedom, pursuit of happiness and basic ideas that are written in the constitution. That is why I don't think the United States will benefit from any changes to the constitution.
Brisa L. 70 in response to Domenic R. 70
ReplyDeleteI agree with Dominic 70 when he said that we are taking for granted many good things that the bills of rights give us.
Cherita T.
ReplyDeleteno, i don't believe they should change the constitution, it is the document our county was founded on, and it has worked for us so far. i however do believe the that they should go back and write "the constitution for dummies" so that it applies to modern day, and that everyone gets the same interpretation of what it means. this non-official constitution should be used in the courts when determining if something is constitutional or not so that everyone is one the same page instead of having three different interpretations by three different people. but by all means dont re-write it. if they feel it is outdated the call it something else
Maya S. 70
ReplyDeleteI believe the constitution needs to change according to what's going on in today's life. Back then things were very different and we had different ways of handeling certain events. If the government took a look at the way the system worked now and made minor adjustments, I believe it would make the world a better place, I mean the adjustments would most certainly be to better the people in the united states anyway right? On the other hand I agree with Lelia C. when saying if we had it our way, we would be burger king and not the united states. That is so true. Although some of us may feel as though we need the constitution to keep changing, bottome line it's not up to us so we have to accept what's going and and roll with the punches as we've been doing.
Octavio P.41
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, the Constitution of the United States of America was written in a time when the fabric of our society was far from the realities and even morals of our present times. It was a wonderful document that promised a splendid set of rights and privileges to all those that where consider bona fide citizens of the land at that time. Through the years society change and with those changes came the awakening of several groups of individuals that were strong enough to bring incredible changes to a document that seemed to have infinite power on the land.
Several of those changes, for example; Amendment 13, the abolition of slavery, Amendment 20, women suffrage, and even the Amendment 21, the abolition of Amendment 18 concerning prohibition laws, served as a reminder that times change, and the people have to determine when change is pertinent, taking in consideration ethics, morals and even more important, what their conscience dictates them to be the right position to adopt. Change doesn’t come easy for some people for whom the status quo served well at the present time, but history is a constant changing force that requires adaptation in order to grow and develop.
Technology as well as many other changes that we have experienced in the course of our lifetime had brought to all of us access to knowledge that once was only available for those with wealth and status. For example, the Electoral College was instituted in a time when those in power believed that those who didn’t have access to the political agenda didn’t have the right to decide the future of the country. Today anyone that has desire for knowledge and sense of civic duty, is capable of educate himself about politics and what all candidates stand for. That will never warrant that the people’s decision would not be based on their personal gain instead of the good of our country. I believe is time that democracy and the majority of citizens verdict prevail and, not an outdated system that, in my opinion was nothing but prejudicial to many American citizens.
Yes the Constitution should be change because, Constitution is not a static document, Constitution of many countries, including that have undergone may amendments since their inception. So there is no need to take extreme position either that brand it as outdated and demand its replacement with an entirely new one, or insist that the constitution should be so perfect that there should not arise any need for its amendment in future. The nature of societies change with time, and with that the most appropriate ways of managing societies also need to change. This at times requires some changes in constitution, and every good constitution recognizes this need and incorporates provisions for its amendment.
ReplyDeleteALICE PESSIMA,Yes the Constitution should be change because, Constitution is not a static document, Constitution of many countries, including that have undergone may amendments since their inception. So there is no need to take extreme position either that brand it as outdated and demand its replacement with an entirely new one, or insist that the constitution should be so perfect that there should not arise any need for its amendment in future. The nature of societies change with time, and with that the most appropriate ways of managing societies also need to change. This at times requires some changes in constitution, and every good constitution recognizes this need and incorporates provisions for its amendment.
ReplyDeleteAugust 28, 2011 7:42 AM
POST A COMMENT
Dana M.70
ReplyDeleteSince it has been since years since I actually read the Bill of Rights I actually took the time to sit down and read them. I personally do not think that the point of each should be changed. I know we live in a very different world now. We have made great advancements in technology and other areas, but I do not think one has anything to do with the rights that are being protected. My only thought is that maybe it should be rewritten in a modern style that people of this generation are used to.
Tameca L 85
ReplyDeleteOur Constitution was written hundreds of years ago. It was written as the bases of our laws. to protect everyone's rights and freedom. And no i do not think it should be changed. i feel that if everyone would abide by the laws instead of trying to find a way around them, our county would be a better place. and even though society has changed, it does not mean our laws change.
Dana M.70 In response to Tameca L.85
I am in total agreement with you Tameca. It seems that our current generation spends to much time and energy trying to find a way to get around the laws for their own personal gains. Sadly we see this way to often in our own government.
Octavio P.41
ReplyDeleteCharles S.
I respect your opinion and, thanks to the United States Constitution you can proclaim it. In my opinion, we have grown as a nation because the changes that some very strong and determine people were willing to fight and in many instances died for. History is a constant changing event. In order for us to keep that growth that made us what we have become, we must be open to the realization that the ideas and laws that worked for us yesterday might not work for us tomorrow. The Constitution had and will be always be open to change for as long as someone in the land believes that change is necessary for the growth of the nation as a whole. I’m talking about changes that will help us materialize the prosperity that we all deserve. I don’t measure prosperity in terms of how much wealth or global power we have achieved in the course of our existence as a nation. In my opinion, we have prospered by embracing ideals and morals that we acknowledged to be the honorable way of life in the Land of the Free.
About the Ten Commandments I have to say that conscience and decency by themselves dictate the acts of the human race. There are people in villages around the world that had never have access to a Bible and millions that have religious beliefs far from the Christian faith and that doesn’t keep them from doing what’s right and moral. The Ten Commandments for those that believe in the Christian faith are the map to the right path. Those that have other believes and are decent and respectful of others ideals must be embraced equally since ,in my opinion we all come from the same Source and the only matter that separate us, is ourselves in a quest for making each other live the way we live and believe in what we believe.
I believe all of the Amendments are still able to be used easily in any instance relating to the law, except maybe the second amendment. With our society today, I think that there should be greater restrictions on weapons and who can own them.
ReplyDeleteSharise H. 70
ReplyDeleteI think the Bible says it best when it tells us to not be lovers of the world. I personally believe that includes adjusting or changing laws that were put in place years ago simply because society is changing. Lets be honest here, society is not changing for the best. While reviewing the Bill of Rights, I did notice that two amendments seemed either unclear or is violated ona regular basis. Amendment IV: Right of search and seizure regulation is not properly enforced. Millions of people are searched with out proper cause. Amendment VIII: Excessive bail and cruel punishment needs some clarification. Exactly what constitutes cruel punishment? Does stoning and the use of a firing squad for the death penalty seem like fair punishment?
Gina W. 62
ReplyDeleteI do not think that the Constitution should be changed. Even though society and technology has evolved and advanced tremendously these documents have still served us right for hundreds of years. There is no point in completely changing the whole Constitution now.
In response to Samisha S-67
I totally agree with you. If there is any change in the Constitution i believe we should only add instead of change completely. We've stood behind these documents for many years there is no reason for us to change them now.
In response to Jason H67...
ReplyDeleteWe may all feel that a person is guilty as a society, but there must be proven evidence to actually convict someone of a crime. As I'm sure you are probably referring to the Casey Anthony trial, they did not have evidence enough to actually convict her of murder. That is why we have that amendment, because if we threw everyone in prison because we feel they might have done something, our system would be more corrupt then anyone could imagine. Public opinion can't convict someone, evidence does.
I believe all of the Amendments are still able to be used easily in any instance relating to the law, except maybe the second amendment. With our society today, I think that there should be greater restrictions on weapons and who can own them.
ReplyDeleteIn response to Jason H67...
ReplyDeleteWe may all feel that a person is guilty as a society, but there must be proven evidence to actually convict someone of a crime. As I'm sure you are probably referring to the Casey Anthony trial, they did not have evidence enough to actually convict her of murder. That is why we have that amendment, because if we threw everyone in prison because we feel they might have done something, our system would be more corrupt then anyone could imagine. Public opinion can't convict someone, evidence does.
Sharise H. 70
ReplyDeleteIn response to Heidi Nelson-Tudor, I am not sure if you are suggesting change. I do agree that society has changed greatly due to technology. You stated "the foundation and core of our constitution should stay the same". If that is the case, are you proposing change or not.
personally i dont believe the constitution should be changed because we have focused and relied heavily for centuries on those laws.
ReplyDeletemaybe a tweak or so could help with our new age society.
responding to Heidi Nelson-Tudor
ReplyDeletei think ill have to agree with you. we both agree that little change is needed to get by. yet at the same time it is not due to the fact we have made way all this time using this constitution.
Kristine K-04
ReplyDeleteI believe there needs somewhat of a change to our Constitution, tweaking, if you will. It has worked all this time but as years have passed, of course with everything changing in our society, people are finding ways to elude certain situations. Innocent people come at fault or, I feel, the justice system isn't doing enough at times..
In response to Sharice H.
I have to agree with you on almost everything you said. Our country is able to go around laws or try to "outsmart" the justice system so easily and it's not going to get better on its own. I would love to see some change in a our constitution, for the better. Especially a lot more equal rights, more free speech, a change in the right to bear arms, and a little bit of tweaking here and there.
Susette R. 67
ReplyDeleteFirst and foremost, I believe everything in general needs structure. Our nation was built upon our constitution as a guide for our society and governmental structure. I believe that there are small changes that should be made to our constitution to correct some of the issues we are having in the world today due to our ever-changing society, economy, political representation, etc. Not to mention, I don't think that our country is run by the best group of people nor do I think those people respect our constitution and "foundation". I believe that the root of our constitution should stay but I think that there are small changes that can be made that will not destroy our country, yet make it a better place to live in the 21st century.
Susette R-67 in response to Octavio P.-41
WOW. VERY WELL SAID! I agree with everthing you mentioned. Our nation and society is constantly changing and as a country we have to accomodate for these changes. I don't think we should destroy our foundation, however, I think we can make it better. I like to look at it through the eyes of a mother (because I am one). I can't continue to dress my child in clothes that don't fit him when he is changing and growing every day. Style is changing, brands are changing and people are changing in the way they grow. To continue to try to dress him in the same clothes would be ignorant and dumb... the same goes with our constitution. It is the body but not the clothes that fit in our society today. Thank you for a response worth reading!
Courtney T. 70
ReplyDeleteNo, I don’t think the constitution should be changed. I think the constitution sets a basis for how society should be. It sets the groundwork and gives some type of order. I also believe we should have a loose interpretation of it and laws. However, if a major problem arises that affects the whole country, different races social backgrounds and such then adding amendments to the Bill of Rights may be necessary, after everyone votes of course.
In response to Dominic R.
I agree with your post on the fact that the Bill of Rights gives its citizens the right to be free.
With all the diversity that we all have it gives us a chance to explore different cultural backgrounds, religions, languages and more.
Somehow we in the modern society seem to think that all of societies of yesteryears were dumb, illiterate, and uneducated, and that somehow decisions we make and the lives that we live are inherently better than theirs were. We seldom forget that they built buildings that lasted for centuries not decades. They read books for entertainment they did not watch television. They created Masterpieces in art, music, and architeture that we marvel at today. I say all this in order to show that the thinking - both forethought and afterthought - that went into the writing of the constitution enabled adjustments to be made. These adjustments are called amendments. However, to write a new constitution entirely would tear down the basic principles of what the constitution is based upon - freedom, liberty, and equality- and has made the US Constitution the document that most other countries strive to imitate.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your comment. The interpretation of the constitution is what needs to be changed. Does the constitution say that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is only for white Americans? or was this implied by those who interpreted the constitution? When it says that landowners can vote, did it exclude women and people of color? The truth is that no matter what a document says it is up to the interpretation and application as to what becomes fair or unfair, just or unjust.
ReplyDeleteDomenic R.70
ReplyDeleteI agree with Lelia C. on how greedy politicians would become in changing the Constitution. Anymore it seems like it's more of a party challenge than a "make the people happy" challenge.
KeithR67, The Constitution has been amended to include African Americans and women. There are many times that I wish we would go back to where only landowner's could vote. It amazes me how most citizens are uninformed when it comes to what is going on in this country, but can tell you everything that happened on reality t.v.
I believe that there is room for improvement when it comes to the Constitution. As society is changing and advancing I think we need to have amendments that go along with our growing society. As far as the Bill of Rights being changed I don't think those should be changed. I think that the Bill of Rights were written as the foundation for the Constitution. Making a change to them would be a disservice to George Mason and the men that helped him write the Bill of Rights.
ReplyDeleteThough the Bill of Rights was written some time ago, the issues it deals with do not change. The reason for this is that human nature does not change. The rights were elucidated in the Bill to keep the federal government from taking too much control over the people. The country's founders understood that men will always seek power over other men, and that government is the most dangerous tool available for men to have control over others. Technological change does nothing to change the fact that men (and women, of course) will strive to enforce their will upon others through the only legal means possible, government. Therefore, government itself must be constrained.
ReplyDeleteThomas L 44
ReplyDeleteI dont think there would really be a point of changing it. At the end of the day the constitution itself can still be amended, and since the Bill of Rights is part of the Constituion it can be amended as well. For example, the 18th admenment was about prohibition was tooken out a long time ago. So if rules can be ignored, then rules can be changed.
RebeccaG-69
ReplyDeleteYes, the Constitution is outdated somewhat. But, I think it should not be changed. It was written for a reason and it should not be changed. To me, we should focus more on the economy,finding more usable resources, and building our country to be better. The constitution is not our problem, our economy and our government needs a lot of improvement seeing that now it's falling apart.
RachaelH69 In response to the above comment:
I believe 100% with your comment. It is not the Constitution that needs to be changed. The people that are responsible for enforcing the Constitution need to be checked. I think that our Founding Fathers would be disgraced at the way our government has turned out today.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt is important because it is a guarantee that the United States Government, and later the States, would not infringe on rights that are personal to every human being in this nation, and those reserved to the States.
ReplyDeleteIt was written in 1789 when most of the delegates to the Constitutional convention felt it was necessary to articulate rights they believed to be inherent in the rights of mankind. Therefore, they chose to embody those rights into the Constitution by amending it to add the first 10 amendments. Thereafter, the constitution was amended at various other times.
MarkS72 in response to Dalton Cash 70:
ReplyDeleteI have to disagree that the 2nd Amendment needs to be changed. Legal gun ownership is the individual's best form of self defense in situations of real or potential violence, whether the violence comes from another individual or from the government. Recent 20th century history of the Third Reich bears the truth of the old cliche', "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."
Thomas L 67 respost I put the wrong crn#
ReplyDeleteI dont think there would really be a point of changing it. At the end of the day the constitution itself can still be amended, and since the Bill of Rights is part of the Constituion it can be amended as well. For example, the 18th admenment was about prohibition was tooken out a long time ago. So if rules can be ignored, then rules can be changed.
Thomas L67 reponse to KiethR67
ReplyDeleteHa Ha that reality T.v. joke was funny but I do agree with you on that. I think the constituion does need change. Because Albert said it the best "insanity is doing the same task over and over again expecting diffrent results".
Ryan H,69 in response to Tameca L85
ReplyDelete"...again technology will always change, society will always change, but the bases of our laws should not change.
If technology changes and society changes, why shouldn't the basis of our laws change? Not letting our laws evolve could limit the advancement of technology and our society (example is stem cell research).
"...and people should stop trying to find away around those laws."
The government should stop putting laws in our way to have to go around! :)
Shelicia H. (70).
ReplyDeleteThe constitution was founded on very moral beliefs and religion. I think it gives fellow man a conscious about what they do right or wrong. It makes people believe they have to justify their choices. I think the ammendments that are added are the right way to go, you don't know the need for a new law until a problem usually occurs. This is unfortunate, but just how it is. If we tried to predict everything and make a law for it we still wouldn't cover everything and that would be a waste of time and a head ache. with an over all the laws would still be on the same bases, but in different words. I think since society also knows what is expected it's harder to break, If an over haul were to occur now it would cause alot of confusion. So well save the time and the fuss and do it as needed.
Renee A 67 responding to Brisa L 70
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Brisa. Why change what we have lived by for so many years. I think it would cause an lot of controversy if it was changed.
I agree with you we would really lose all respect for our government and what in stands for. Really could you imagine,the Ten Revised Amendments.
ReplyDeleteGeorge M 67 in response to Tameka
ReplyDeleteI dont think that the idea to not change laws is a good one. With facebook, craigslist, and the internet in general the world is a different place with different methods to break laws. Laws should change to reflect the advancement of society
I apologize in advance but I am not a history buff and/or very intelligent when it comes to politics.
ReplyDeleteI don't think changing the Constitution is a good idea. Like so many responses it was made for a reason and changing it I feel would not benefit us people in the end. I believe it would only benefit the ones that want to change it. Rules are Rules, Laws are Laws and if they were made to be broken than it would create a lot of chaos. As it is there is a lot going on in our government behind closed doors that is unlawful and yet us little people feel it.
Sandra S/69
Erica,
ReplyDeleteI am in agreement that the Constitution should remain in its current state. We cannot rewrite history and the Constitution is our laws and values inked into history. I feel as though we should amend our other laws, but with reason and sticking to the foundation of the Constitution.
While I consider myself to be a person of open mind, seeking a society and Government of growth, some things are meant to be left as original. Technology is a great addition and certainly has afforded the world a great deal of positive additions.With that being said, all historical writings were set into place as a form of foundation for the centuries to come. We must not tamper with the foundation or blueprint. As a people of compromise, I agree that finding strategic ways to add to our current Constitution would be better than changing what has gotten us so far.
ReplyDeleteI definitely had a little chuckle at your comment of reality television shows.
ReplyDeleteA prime example of altering with boundaries is the King James Bible and other religious books that were released in modern jargon. The basics of the work remained the same, however, it was restructured for "new day interpretation". The Constitution has been amended, as you stated. I agree that this is the extent of which it should be changed.
FREE BIRD!!!!
ReplyDeleteYes the constitution is outdated. So much has changed over the years therefore, we need the constitution to be updated.
ReplyDeleteEmma Ayala
ReplyDeleteI think the constitution should not be changed. It was made as a foundation for this country. I agree with other comments that instead of changing it there should just be some additions to it.
Changing the constitution does not rewrite history. The signing of the constitution and the events surrounding it is history. The constitution is law, and cannot get stuck in the past.
ReplyDeleteTammy Smith-52
ReplyDeletePersonally I feel that for the most part the general outline of the constitution still works in our society today. However, so much has changed since the signing of the constitution I do feel that there are some areas that could be revisited and revised to be more in line with the world today. I do feel that in doing so that the original script should be preserved and only ammended where need be.
Tammy Smith-52 in response to Shelicia H.
ReplyDeleteI very strongly agree with your comment. I do believe that the constitution was written with everything that the United States was built on in mind and should never be completely overhauled. I feel that a complete change in the doctrine that this country was originally founded on would cause confusion as to what we as a nation stand for and abide by.
Michelle J.
ReplyDeleteLaws in the Constitution were given to society to regulate it for order and peace, so if those in positions of authority want to change it they have that right to do so. After all the source of the Constitution was men who founded the United States; therefore, any changes to that document would still be a credit to America. And lately it seems people want that type of Constitution established in their countries anyway. Because America's Constitution rings true to them about what it means to be free.
I believe that the Constitution should slightly modified. I dont think that huge changes are necessary. This is society was formed around this set of laws and it has worked for us so far. As the country evolves i believe that some laws should.
ReplyDeleteJasmine Jackson
ReplyDeleteI believe that the Constitution should slightly modified. I dont think that huge changes are necessary. This is society was formed around this set of laws and it has worked for us so far. As the country evolves i believe that some laws should.
Jasmine Jackson in response to Tammy Smith
ReplyDeleteI agree with Tammy's comment. As a country we have not remained the same so therefore I believe that the constitution should evolve with us. Again, no major changes are necessary.
Megan G-70
ReplyDeleteIf you think about it, times were so different when the Constitution was created. It was made the suit the times back then. Now we have so much technology and so much change. I think that as long as we are changing the world around us, we need to make sure we keep the Constitution up to date. That doesnt mean that I think it needs to be completely re-written, however im sure that there are plenty of things in the Constitution that would be tweeked to suit our lives and how things have changed in todays world.
Megan G-70 in response to Jasmine Jackson
ReplyDeleteI agree that the original constitution has worked for the world so far. However, think about how much has changed since the Constitution was signed. Our world is completely different. And then when you think about even further down the line and how much MORE will be changed and even more new technology and everything else. I believe it would only make sense to keep the Constitution up to date with the times. Not everything will need change but a little modification for sure.
Daquan. F-70
ReplyDeleteSociety is constantly changing, moral views, and aspects towards what the nation needs/doesn't need. Nobody will agree with every article or amendment stated in the constitution because we are constantly changing. You must also remember, 200 years ago women/African Americans did not share the same rights as other Americans. It took time and progress for peoples aspects to change and realize what is right and wrong. Over time, new amendments were being added to the Constitution to better our society, so why not change certain amendments to do the same? If you concentrate too much on the past, you will be left behind. Although I don't believe any major changes are necessary, if a few adjustments to the constitution must happen to better the U.S, then so be it.
In response to Heidi Nelson-Tudo: I agree with you fully. You cannot live based on the lifestyles of people one hundred years or more before you. Life goes on and changes must be made to accommodate.
I do not think the Constitution should be changed even though our generation has changed. This document starts with a very powerful tone and is defending the Country and the people of the country. This document, sacred in a way, should be kept and be admired and never forgotten. I feel like it would be blasphemous to change the constitution, It would be like changing the Bible so that it could fit our generation. Both the Bible and the Constitution are pieces of Literature that people quote, stand by, beleive in, and treasure.
ReplyDeleteIsabelle44
ReplyDeleteI think the Constitution should not be changed but revised because the old constitution has a lot of good laws that need to be preserve for today's society . Well some need to be change because of today's reality from the the 1900's and people have changed and it is not he same so I think we can keep them but need revision, they did had good laws back in the days though lololl
I think the the Constitution should not be changed out right, but some modifications may be needed as new conflicts arise.
ReplyDelete